Ronald Scott started searching on Valentine’s Day.
According to Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri, the now-former deputy used the department’s automated license plate reader system more than 100 times to track his estranged wife, her new boyfriend, and other members of her family. The searches allegedly ran until June 19. Nobody noticed until much later.
Scott, 35, resigned from the Florida department a day before his arrest on November 5. He had worn the badge for 10½ years. He now faces three counts of accessing a computer or electronic device without authority and one count of official misconduct.
The system at the center of the case is Flock Safety, the ALPR company that has spent the past year fielding hard questions about who gets to see where Americans drive, and why. This case answers some of those questions in the worst possible way.
Authorities say Scott’s alleged activity surfaced only after an “enhanced system audit” flagged his access. By then, roughly 8½ months had passed since the first search. Through all of it, Scott kept doing police work.
The searches didn’t trip an alarm. They sat in a log, waiting for someone to look.
That’s by design. Officers don’t need a warrant to query these databases, and in some cases they don’t even need a case number. Scott allegedly gave a string of false explanations for his searches, and the system took them at face value.
Audit trails catch misuse after it happens. They don’t stop it. For the person being tracked, the only protection is the hope that the officer doing the tracking eventually gets caught.
Gualtieri isn’t budging on the technology. “As I’ve repeatedly said, this is a people problem, not an ALPR problem,” the sheriff said. “The issue of people with access to confidential databases misusing those databases for personal reasons has existed forever … we will monitor and take appropriate action when we find misuse.”
He added that he’s confident this is the last “historical” misuse his department will uncover. But Scott is the third Pinellas deputy arrested for this kind of abuse in the last few months.
Three arrests in one department, in a short window, each discovered after the fact. The sheriff’s confidence rests on the same audit process that let 8½ months slip by before anyone caught Scott.
Gualtieri did offer one line that cuts closer than he probably intended. “You can’t fix stupid, and you can’t keep people from doing dumb things,” he said.
ALPR critics would agree with every word. Their argument has never been that the cameras are malicious. It’s that the cameras hand enormous reach to people, and people are the weak point.
A plate reader doesn’t care why it’s being queried. It photographs a car, logs a location, and hands the record to whoever logs in with the right credentials. In Pinellas County, that included a deputy allegedly mapping the movements of a woman who had left him.
The sheriff calls that a human failing the department will keep policing. The people his deputies tracked are the ones who paid for the delay.
The ALPR debate has two camps. One says accept the occasional abuse and clean it up when you find it. The other says the government shouldn’t hold this kind of tracking power at all.
Pinellas County just handed the second camp three fresh case files. Scott’s case heads to court, and the audits are still running.
Share this Story